Mahāsanghikā, Mahāsangītikā
One of the Buddhist schools which separated out from the
Theravādins at the Second Council. The members
rejected the Parivāra, the six sections of the Abhidhamma, the Patisambhidamagga,
the Niddesa and some portions of the Jātakas (KvuA. p. 4; Dpv. v.32ff).
The school was so called owing to the great number of its followers, which
made a great assembly or "Mahāsangitī." They were counted among the Anātmavādins,
and later gave rise to the following schools: the
Originally they had only two divisions - the
Ekabbohārikas and Gokulikas (Rockhill, op.
cit., 182ff).
Their separation from the orthodox school was brought about by the
Vajjiputta monks, and was probably due to
difference of opinion on the ten points (for these see Vin.ii.294f) held by the
Vajjiputta monks. According to Northern sources, however, the split occurred on
the five points raised by Mahādeva:
- (1) An arahant may commit a sin under unconscious temptation;
- (2) one may be an arahant and unconscious of the fact;
- (3) an arahant may have doubts on matters of doctrine;
- (4) one cannot attain arahantship without the help of a teacher;
- (5) the "Noble Way" may begin with some such exclamation as "How sad!"
uttered during meditation (J.R A.S. 1910, p. 416; cf. MT 173).
These articles of faith are found in the Kathāvatthu (173ff., 187ff., 194,
197), attributed to the Pubbaselas and the Aparaselas, opponents of the
Mahāsanghika school.
According to Hiouen Thsang (Beal..ii.164),
the Mahāsanghikas divided their canon into five parts: Sūtra, Vinaya,
Abhidhamma, Miscellaneous and Dhāranī.
Fa Hsien took from Pātaliputta to China a complete transcript of the
Mahāsanghika Vinaya. (Giles, p. 64, Nańjio's Catalogue mentions a Mahāsanghika
Vinaya and a Mahāsanghabhiksunī Vinaya in Chinese translations, Cola. 247, 253.
Ms. No.543).
The best known work of the Mahāsanghikas is the Mahāvastu. Their headquarters
in Ceylon were in Abhayagiri vihāra, and Sena I. is said to have built the
Vīrankurārāma for their use. Cv.1.68.

|